Campaigning for facts

Fake news

Empathy is a More Potent Weapon Than Facts When Combatting Fake News


Fact-Checking Tips: Empathy is a More Potent Weapon Than Facts When

Combatting Fake News

Fact-Checking Tips: Empathy is a More Potent Weapon Than Facts When

Combatting Fake News

A British Academy-commissioned study of fake news and vaccine skeptics found that building a connection is a key ingredient in convincing those who are wary of the benefits of vaccination and health advice.  


The British Academy has recently commissioned seven papers on  About Covid-19 Recovery: Building Future Pandemic Preparedness and Understanding Citizen Engagement in the G7, where one of them looked into fake news and people who are skeptical of Covid-19 vaccines and found that building rapport is a vital ingredient to winning over those who are distrustful of the benefits of vaccination and health advice.  


Focusing on three case studies in France, Italy and Ireland, the project considered how to successfully counter fake news online to re-establish and build trust in healthcare. 


“Disinformation and fake news have come to shape critical scientific discourse over the past couple of years. The Covid19 pandemic should raise alarms within the scientific community and beyond as to why it is critical for us to tackle fake news head-on.” Dr Itziar Castelló, project lead and Associate Professor at the University of Surrey, said:  “Our study makes two essential recommendations that can help to fight disinformation. Firstly, disinformation is about emotions and dealing with them means understanding and using emotions to counter that disinformation.” 

The study of Les Vaxxeuses in France found that only using facts to tackle misinformation didn’t change the hearts and minds of anti-vaxxers or have any substantive effect on vaccine hesitancy. 

The team also looked at the pro-vaccine case of IoVaccino – an Italian Facebook group with more than 100,000 members. The study showed that their focus on scientific facts left ‘no room for doubt or alternative opinions’. This resulted in online exchanges that were dominated by confrontation.   

The final case focused on the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland in the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination which was attacked by an anti-vaccination group called REGRET. The study argues that HSE, in collaboration with the patient advocate Laura Brennan*, was able to change the trend and increase the vaccination rates by more than 20 percent in only two years. Laura Brennan’s engagement combined a very personal and emotional story with a strong understanding of the facts. 

The research Key policy recommendations outlined:  

  • Create partnerships to support social media activists with technical support, emotional support and support in creative, effective communications to encourage better online chats  
  • Governance frameworks that work with social media platforms to reduce misinformation.   

This fascinating and timely research will help policymakers better understand how to tackle the scourge of misinformation surrounding the Covid vaccine and hopefully pave the way for greater uptake of the jab. Understanding this issue is an especially important challenge as autumn and winter threaten to bring more Covid cases across the northern hemisphere.


We are working hard to bring you the latest fact-checked information and tools. Donate every time you read disinformation and the money will be used to pay a fact-checking ad!

Eine einmalige Spende tätigen

Your contribution is appreciated.


Make a monthly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.


Make a yearly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Stay tuned to our Know-how posts: Follow @ ReclaimThefacts on Social media or subscribe to our newsletter below

You May Also Like